Rimworld Glitter Tech Guide

0906

Reed’s having a bad day: her spaceship crashed, she’s one of three survivors, and the other two won’t stop hitting on her. Unfortunately for her, she’s beautiful, which means that they’re immediately enamoured with her; unfortunately for them, she’s gay, which means the feeling is definitely not mutual. Her life is a constant hellish stream of corny pick-up lines and work for the colony.

RimWorld is a scifi colony management sim that seems to effortlessly weave dynamic stories around the player’s attempts to survive on an often harsh alien world, but when it comes to sexuality, romance and gender, it tells variations on this one story far too often. We dug into the code to find out why that is.

Mar 2, 2018 - Skymods. RimWorld Mods Catalogue. Guide to mod modifying: Guide. (No Support Until Further Notice) Supported Mods: Glitter Tech. Building upon the preexisting in-game mentions of futuristic “glitter worlds”, Glitter Tech is more superficial-leaning than most other RimWorld mods but grants you access to an arsenal of advanced power generators, bionic limbs and organs, high tech energy weapons and armour, powerful turrets and automatic mortars, and wall lights. Whether you are trying to make a rocket fuel, a flash device, a glitter fountain, a flitter star, or a long-tailed comet (I know, those are fireworks), your success will depend in part on using the right particle shape. So pay careful attention to the type of aluminum (or other metal powder) prescribed in your motor composition.

Returning to Reed, we can see that the pick-up lines don’t get her down. She receives no penalty to her mood for being barraged by come-ons. But the two men, Rob and Boots, feel differently. They have a near-permanent mood and relationship penalty for Reed, because they keep asking her out, and keep getting rebuffed. But it’s not really their fault – Rob and Boots can’t stop hitting on her because they’re men, and because she’s just so gosh-darned pretty. More precisely, that’s how they’ve been programmed.

The eerie thing is, remove the bit about the crashed spaceship and this scenario mirrors a common narrative about romance, sexuality, and relationships between men and women. It is not at all uncommon to hear stories, in media and in real life, of how men ‘just can’t help themselves’ around beautiful women, and to hear how devastating it is for men to be rejected by the women to whom they are attracted. Setting aside the truth of those stories, and how demeaning they are to men and women both, why is this the story that RimWorld tells about relationships? In order to get to the heart of the situation, I unpacked the latest publicly-available build of RimWorld to see how romantic interactions are determined. For the sake of non-coders among us, longer sections are presented in pseudocode that tells you what it does, without requiring you to be fluent in C#.

To be clear, the anecdote I’ve described above is not a unique scenario in RimWorld. The current top-rated post of all time on the RimWorld subreddit is a user asking for “strategies to deal with attractive lesbians”. Additionally, an earlier decompilation of the game, summarizing how RimWorld models romantic behaviour, was a pretty good indicator that the answer to Reed’s dilemma lay somewhere in the game’s source code.

So why were Reed’s fellow survivors constantly hitting on her? The answer lies, partially, in how romance attempts are calculated differently for male and female “pawns”, the game’s term for all the colonists you control. All pawns start out with a base chance of turning any social interaction into a romance attempt, and a minimum threshold of attractiveness and positive opinion for this to happen. In other words, you have to actually like someone and find them attractive in order to try to start a romantic relationship with them. Things become interesting when the random chance of initiation comes in.

In other words, female pawns are about eight times less likely to try and start a romantic relationship. Granted, this is not the only factor – other elements include presence or absence of an existing romantic partner, and how they feel about said partner. However, this single check on gender has such a profound effect that it makes female-initiated romance attempts incredibly rare. Notice that neither a history of rebuffals nor the presence of the “gay” trait in the recipient are factored in, which would explain why they won’t stop. This behaviour is one-way, though. Reed doesn’t hit on them, not because she’s female, but because she finds them unattractive.

So how is attractiveness actually calculated? For both male and female pawns, attractiveness rests on a few variables: the genders of the initiator and the recipient, the sexual orientation of the initiator, the beauty of the recipient, age, and physical ability.

Before going into gender-specific differences, let’s first look at some universal variables..

// In the rest of the function, multiply attractiveness with the factors for:
// Talking, moving, and manipulation efficiency (penalty for pawns with disabilities)
// Bonus or penalty for attractiveness traits (ugly = 30% as likely, beautiful = 230% as likely)
// Additional age factor for people between 15 and 18else if(me.gender female) {
// Enforce sexual orientation for gay women

There are no straight women in RimWorld, as in, there are no women only attracted to men. Instead, every single non-gay woman in the game has some chance of being attracted to another woman. As for the men, it works a little differently.

// Calculate the perceived attractiveness (between 0.0 and 1.0) of them, to me

Notice that there’s only two possible orientations for men, gay or straight. In RimWorld, there are no bisexual men, only gay or straight men; there are no straight women, only gay or bisexual women.

Lastly, we move on to the most complicated part of this, age-based attraction. These are hard to visualize just by reading the code, so here they are in diagram form.

In RimWorld, male pawns will always find pawns between 20 and their own age attractive. If the male pawn in question is under 20, that doesn’t make a difference – because it’ll check the “lower” bound first, they’re guaranteed to find a 20-year-old attractive. This explains why Rob (age 32) and Boots (age 17) keep trying to ask out Reed (age 23). But, since the same code doesn’t check for relative age, 17-year-old Boots wouldn’t actually find a fellow 17-year-old teenager all that attractive. There’s also a minimum age for attraction, 16 years old, and a maximum age, any pawn 15 years older than themselves. So in this case, Boots wouldn’t find any woman over the age of 32, or any woman under age 16, attractive.

On the other hand, women overwhelmingly prefer partners older than them. And, unlike for men, there’s no firm cutoff for pawns that are “too old”: even pawns 40 years older than the woman in question have a chance of being perceived as attractive. Contrast this to the calculation for men, where pawns 15 years older than them have absolutely no chance.

In summary:

  • Men are about eight times as likely as women to try and start a romance.
  • Pawns with disabilities will always be found less attractive.
  • Beautiful pawns are always considered vastly more attractive; ugly pawns, vastly less. Physical beauty is the only trait that governs attractiveness, aside from sexual orientation.
  • Straight men always find men unattractive. Gay men always find women unattractive. There are no bisexual men.
  • Women may find women attractive. Gay women always find men unattractive. There are only bisexual or gay women.
  • All men consider partners aged 20 to their own age most attractive. If they’re under 20, they’ll find pawns 20 or over most attractive, with no regard for pawns that are a similar age to them.
  • All women consider partners the same age and older most attractive. Partners slightly younger than themselves are very unattractive, and partners that are 10 years younger than them are always considered unattractive.
  • All men consider any pawn 15 years older than themselves to be unattractive.
  • There is no “old age” cutoff for women. No matter how much older a partner is, women have some chance of finding them attractive.

Now, RimWorld is not finished. It’s a game that’s still under constant development, and so this relationship system might well continue to develop and change. On top of that, the various numbers thrown into these governing formulae might well be there because of a late night, or as placeholders, or just to try and make the systems work. In other words, there might not be any specific commentary on or interpretation of gender roles behind this, malicious or otherwise. Any game system that tries to represent or model complicated real-world scenarios necessarily has to make abstractions and sacrifices, and human relationships might be one of the most complicated things you could possibly portray.

But we are not analyzing RimWorld on the basis of what it might be in the future. The question we’re asking is, “what are the stories that RimWorld is already telling?” Yes, making a game is a lot of work, and maybe these numbers were just thrown in without too much thought as to how they’d influence the game. But what kind of system is being designed, that in order to ‘just make it work’, you wind up with a system where there will never be bisexual men? Or where all women, across the board, are eight times less likely to initiate romance?

On top of that, what RimWorld doesn’t model is as important as what it does. Remember how constantly being hit on and rebuffing people doesn’t lead to a mood penalty, only a reduced opinion of the person pursuing? In daily life, the feeling of having to constantly turn people down is not a nice feeling. But these negative feelings are only reflected mechanically for those being rejected, and because of the way romance initiation is handled, you end up having to cater for the sad rejected men, rather than the women who are always having to turn away these unwanted encounters.

We could label that behaviour a bug, perhaps. But those are just the surface symptoms. Those are the easily-noticed, in-game consequences of a system whose base structure has literally encoded assumptions about how men and women operate. Now, representation is a tricky subject, and we will probably never create a perfect model of romantic behaviour.

But the problem with this model isn’t that it’s flawed. It’s that it’s flawed in a way that perfectly mirrors existing sexist expectations of romance, with such specificity that it is hard to view it as unintentional . And if it is unintentional it is on us to ask what this system is trying to show. What are the possibilities that it allows? What is RimWorld setting as the boundaries of possibility?

Decompiling the source code provides a very clear look at how these gender differences were written into the game. However, it’s not something that’s intuitive to grasp just by playing the game. At the same time, this is a system that has an enormous impact on how you play, because one of the key challenges in RimWorld is keeping your colonists happy. Code is never neutral. All of these coded structures push a particular scenario over others, and most of the time this is fairly benign. However, this does not mean that it should escape scrutiny, because we can end up uncritically coding in harmful assumptions, which ultimately means we are constraining what our games could be while also alienating other players.

As for Reed, things have gotten a little better. Other women have joined the colony, and one of them, nineteen-year-old Roughchild, has gotten engaged to Rob. Reed’s on better terms with Rob, now that he’s spending time with his fiancee instead of constantly trying to get with her. Everyone still adores her, of course, because she’s beautiful; everyone still talks to her, and Boots is still making passes at her. But the feeling is never mutual.

Editor’s note: The developer was contacted for interview as part of this article, but declined to take part unless we ceded editorial control over the publishing of that interview. We do not cede editorial control to developers or interview subjects and so no interview took place. The developer has left a response below in the comments and here on Reddit. We stand by the accuracy of the article entirely.

Are you new to IGN's wiki guides? Whether you're looking to create your own wiki or add to others, this page contains five very basic -- and very easy -- lessons you need to get started.

Anyone who has an IGN account and is logged in can make an edit to a wiki page. Here are the three basic steps to editing any pages.

1) Click on the EDIT button at the top of the page and you will be whisked away to the wiki editor view. Go ahead and try it on this page, if you want!

2) In the wiki editor you can make changes to the body of the page you are currently viewing. Don't worry, any changes you make can be undone (or 'rolled back').

3) Any changes you make will be saved when you hit SAVE in the upper right corner of the edit window.

Getting to Know the Wiki Editor
[edit]

The wiki editor (or editing interface) should look familiar. There are multiple formatting options at the top of the editing window, including extremely handy paragraph headers, bullet points, and hyperlink tools.

Note that there are two tabs at the top of the wiki editor that say RICH TEXT EDITOR/WIKI MARKUP. You can write and layout a page easily with the Rich Text Editor, but you can freely switch back and forth between it and the Wiki Markup view, which shows the view of the page in wiki markup code -- which is also totally editable.

Words are boring, though. You can do so much more with the wiki editor! Like adding images...

You can add images using the wiki editor. Hit EDIT and make sure you are in the Rich Text Editor view.

Screen_Shot_2012-09-12_at_3.40.22_PM.png

In the wiki editor there is a MEDIA LIBRARY for the wiki just to the right of the editor -- it's under the SAVE button. This has a tab for video and screenshots. Any existing images in the gallery can be added from the gallery by clicking on the gallery thumbnail. To upload a new image, follow these steps:

Tech

1) Click UPLOAD. This will open the image uploader box.

2) Select a file from your computer. You can upload up to 5 files at once. After selecting your files hit UPLOAD in the image uploader box. Close the uploader.

Screen_Shot_2012-09-12_at_3.41.27_PM.png

3) Your images should now appear in the Media Gallery to the right. Select your image from the gallery and click on it. It will appear wherever your cursor appears in the document.

Resizing an Image[edit]

When you add an image to a wiki page, it will automatically be resized to half page width so you can put two images side-by-side easily. To change the image size and properties, double click on the image in the wiki editor.

Screen_Shot_2012-09-12_at_3.42.28_PM.png

Here you can set the width and the image will automatically resize the height. 468px is the full page width of the wikis. You can also set the alignment -- align a small image to the right and text will wrap around it nicely!

Link_triforce.png

Victory!

You can add both IGN and YouTube videos to wikis. All you need is the URL of the video page.

In the Rich Text Editor, hit the button that looks like a film strip. Copy the URL from the YouTube or IGN video page and paste it into the field here and the video will appear wherever your cursor currently is in the wiki editor.

Screen_Shot_2012-09-12_at_4.50.22_PM.png

You can copy the small SPECIAL code box around the wiki editor freely if you need to move it. You can also embed videos useing wiki markup code.

IGN wikis feature an awesome navigation bar, or 'nav,' on the left side of every page.

Here you'll find a well-organized list of wiki pages and topics. The navigation can be edited freely, but any changes you make to page names will not point to the old pages, so be careful not to lose track of pages (you can always check the history page)

To add to or adjust the nav, follow these steps:

1) Click EDIT NAV at the bottom of the gray navigation box.

Editnav.jpg

2) In the nav editor you can add new pages (sections) by clicking + ADD PAGE. You also can add pages to sub-sections of existing pages.

3) Move around existing pages by clicking on them and dragging them up and down. This will affect what order they appear in the navigation.

(See above!) Adding a page to the Nav is the best way to add pages to a wiki. Once you've added the page to the Nav and hit 'Save,' you can then click on the new link in the Nav and begin editing it.

Linking within a wiki is incredibly important. To easily link to other articles within a wiki, you can simply highlight text in the rich text editor and hit the 'chain' button.

Type in the name of the page in the wiki you would like to link to -- capitalization matters! -- and hit OK.

You can follow the same procedure to link to external sites, just enter the full URL of the site you'd like to link your selection to.

Pro tip: In the Wiki Markup View that you can use double brackets around a page title to easily link to another page. So:

Becomes: Making Links.

Just be sure your link doesn't link to an empty page. If it does, you can add a redirect to another page or fill out the new empty page yourself.

Citing Sources[edit]

Sources are a unique type of link that generally link to another reliable (non-wiki) source, like IGN!

The best way to add a source is to enter the Wiki Markup View of the editor and add single brackets around your source URL.

Rimworld Glitter Tech Guide Reviews

Becomes: The Legend of Zelda was released in 1987. [n]

Rimworld Advanced Guide

A nifty link is even added as a footnote at the bottom of the page, automatically!

Anything done in a wiki can be undone -- it's easy! You have the power to undo the edits of others. But with great power comes basic politeness and a bit of responsibility!

Hit HISTORY in the top right of any page to view and/or edit history of that page. Here you can see the editor who made the change and when the change was made. On the right are three tools:

  • Click the magnifying glass to view the previous version of the page.
  • Click the sheets of paper to compare changes made in that revision. Additions are marked in yellow and deletions marked in red.
  • Click on the blue arrow to UNDO the changes made. Clicking the blue arrow leaves a note on the page that the revision was undone -- and you can always go back to a previous revision. It's kind of like time travel!

Rimworld Glitter Tech Guide Reviews

Pro Tip: Click Wiki Tools in the Nav and then click Recent Changes to see a history page for the entire wiki!

When you undo another user's change, you are given the option to leave a note -- please do so, and explain why you made the change. It's common courtesy.

You can do so much more with wikis! Here are some other helpful (advanced!) wiki topics:

Glitter
Comments
This entry was posted on 06.09.2019.